August 25th, 2008

By: jon | August 25th, 2008

With 9 games remaining, DC United sit at 31 points, and tied for forth in the Eastern Conference. In the next 2 months, they have 7 additional matches to play, including the US Open Cup final, and CONCACAF Champions League Group play. DC will obviously want to win the Open Cup, as it serves as automatic qualification into the Champions League next year, and DC has made it clear thru words and actions that it very seriously wants to compete well in International competition. Superliga didn’t work out so well, so we can only hope that they were tanking it, and Champions League will be a different story.

This brings me to the point of my post.

The constraints of the MLS Single Entity system has been discussed ad nauseum on tv, blogs, and message boards. I won’t get into it here. All the teams know the rules, and are forced to play by them *unless you are LA Galaxy.

Knowing the salary issues associated with it, DC United decided to bring in a designated player. Marcello Gallardo, with a storied international and club career, was brought into be the natural successor to Christian Gomez. Gomez, who wanted more money and more years, left town to Colorado, where he has shown flashes of skill, but now resides on the bench of a bad team. In June, Gallardo has shown flashes of why he was brought in, with the ability to link up with Emilio and help in the offense. At the time his arrival, it was stressed that he wouldn’t be the goal scorer that Gomez was, and he hasn’t been (4 goals in 12 matches). And it has also been discussed that judging a players contributions, particularly a player like #10, is difficult and open to interpretation (see here). His serious injury has made this point all the more obvious, and has possibly exaggerated its seriousness.

But why did DC United, knowing the salary cap constraints, choose to use the DP slot, and decide to use it on Marcello Gallardo.

Gallardo is not 25. He’s 32. In soccer years, that’s like 40 for baseball players. His salary cap hit is $300,000, or 4.5 Santino Quarantas. He has three assists, and has now been injured 2 months, and has played in two less games than Rod Dyachenko.

With one player taking up 13% of the salary cap, and 7% more being used by an inactive Ben Olsen, DC United severely tied their hands in regard to player acquisition this year. Add to this constraint the erroneous Niell move which also cost 150k and Jose Carvallo, who was not cheap and played in one (ONE!!) game, and DC was forced to sign cheap, cheap, cheap bench players. DC was so tight that it lost Andrew Jacobson to Lorient, a lower table Ligue 1 team, a league not known for its high salaries. The year before, DC lost Jay Needham to a USL team for the same reason. A draft pick who they could afford to pay the meager developmental salary, Dan Stratford, was waived after showing general ineffectiveness.

With the decision to utilize the DP slot, and the unwise moves stated above, DC needed to draft well. Well, it didn’t, and it never has. Jeremy Barlow, drafted, waived. Justin Moose, drafted, waived. Jerson Montiero, traded for draft picks, waived. Brandon Owens, drafted, unsigned. Tony Schmitz, drafted, never offered contract.

To be successful in this or any league, you need depth, talent, and a little luck. In MLS, you are hamstrung unlike in any other league in the world. Because of that, you need a lot more luck and a more evenly spread out team talent wise. Look at New England and Houston. Common thread…no designated player, strong bench, take the Draft seriously and sign the players they draft. Also, notice their success in MLS Cup and in regular season results.

My main point. The designated player rule is a flop. Is it a success commercially? Yes. As far as on field results, the jury is out. LA has been bad, most likely because of the DP rule. Chicago has done well, but they have an otherwise strong side, with multiple international players. KC is in the basement. Columbus is an anomaly, but I will mostly ignore that as its counterfactual to my argument, and bloggers can do that. If DC wants to continue to use the DP slot, much more attention needs to be paid to college teams, and future foreign acquisitions need to be economical and successful. At the end of the season, I’ll revisit this argument to see where the taems using the DP slot finished.



DC United MLS ForumsDC United ResultsBet on DC United games Buy DC United Tickets


Subscribe
 

rss_icon The Offside RSS Feeds

Print
Print article
Share
del.icio.us:August 25th, 2008 digg:August 25th, 2008 reddit:August 25th, 2008 fark:August 25th, 2008 Y!:August 25th, 2008 stumbleupon:August 25th, 2008

Comments  

  • Anthony |  August 25th, 2008 at 8:45 am

    cornercorner

    Excellent article!

    Posted from United States

    cornercorner
  • ij |  August 25th, 2008 at 8:48 am

    cornercorner

    DC’s biggest probelm this year imo hasn’t been poor choices in their signings, but terrible luck with injuries. Nearly every important player on this team has been injured for at least a some period this season. Olsen, Gallardo, Fred, Quaranta, Peralta, as well as several others. With the economic constraints of MLS teams cannot afford injuries if they want to be successful. This is even more stressed in DC’s case because of there congested schedule. Hopefully in the coming weeks most if not all of these guys can get back out on the field and we will see results similar to last weekend. I will agree that DC’s inability to draft, and sign, anyone who can help the senior team is frustrating. To be successful in the long term they’ll have to improve upon recent failures. The inability to sign Jay Needham came down to cheapness. The USL was able to offer him more. He went on to win Rookie of the Year and is now rumored to be moving to europe. For a team that has had trouble defending he could have been a big help if United was willing to offer him a decent wage.

    Posted from United States United States

    cornercorner
  • msc |  August 25th, 2008 at 9:37 am

    cornercorner

    i agree w/ij

    Posted from United States United States

    cornercorner
  • Anthony |  August 25th, 2008 at 9:53 am

    cornercorner

    I say dump Gallardo and pick up 3-4 decent young players with his money

    Posted from United States

    cornercorner
  • bluemeanies |  August 25th, 2008 at 10:56 am

    cornercorner

    Sorry, but the money was there for Needham or Jacobson but not one of the 18 senior roster spots that would be needed to offer them the money. And at the time of negotiation nobody would have said they were among the 18 best options for the team (with all over 25yr players needing to be there). Jacobson probably would have gone overseas anyway. And not conning Colorado into giving us their DP spot for an out of contract player would have made it very hard to keep Emilio.

    Yeah, or draft has been bad, but our trade/import record is well above average. So much so that it is rather hard for a draft pick to break in.

    As for dumping Gallardo and getting in 3 or 4 young players- impossible. The resources opened by dumping Gallardo would be: 1 senior roster spot, 1 DP spot, $400,000, 1 international spot. So I guess we could do the South American roulette again with it, or up McTavish and Burch a bit (though we might be able to do that now if we wanted to).

    The next move to be made will be moving Mediate to the injured reserve and either signing someone new or bringing Joe Vide back up to the senior roster. Now picking that kid off waivers was a good move.

    Posted from United States United States

    cornercorner
  • jon |  August 25th, 2008 at 11:44 am

    cornercorner

    Emilio would have been kept for at least this year under his former contract without the DP slot. The merits of keeping him or not is another post entirely. The point about having more money to play with is being able to entice better players for the senior spots than we currently have. Burch is okay, but we could do better. Dyachenko, same thing.
    Agreed on the Vide move, and kudos to him for being alright with the move down to poverty levels. My bet is he moves up to the senior roster, and we bring in someone else on a trial.

    Posted from United States United States

    cornercorner
  • Thierry |  September 11th, 2008 at 11:55 am

    cornercorner

    I had an interview (audio) in French with Marcelo Gallardo after the game in San Jose last Saturday:

    http://www.thebaysoccer.com/gallardo090608.php

    It’s more about his adaptation to MLS and his memories in France than about the game and DC United, but if some of your readers understand french, they might be interrested!

    Posted from United States

    cornercorner

Comments are closed


USA National Team News

Tickets to upcoming games


Offside RSS Feeds

Search The Offside


 

rounded_corners







Categories


rounded_corners

Send Your Tips!

Found a great story, photo or video that's perfect for The Offside?
Email dcunited[at]theoffside[dot]com

Related Links


Write for The Offside

LATEST COMMENTS


Archives